EVERYONE SELLS YOU SOFTWARE. WE SHOW YOU IT WORKING.
Two of these are ours and you can run them on sample job data. The rest is the honest map of what an $80M to $100M contractor should pay for. No referral fees, no reseller margin, no vendor writing our list for us.
BUILT BY US, RUNNING ON SAMPLE DATA
LIVE ON SAMPLE JOB DATAAUTOMATED RFI FOLLOW-UP
The RFI arrives already drafted, priced for impact and routed to a name. A reviewer approves, the follow-up runs itself.
RUN IT ON SAMPLE JOB DATA — NO LOGIN
OPEN THE TOOLSJOB COST SCHEDULER
Upload the estimate, get a sequenced Gantt with the conflicts already flagged and the dollars attached to each one.
RUN IT ON SAMPLE JOB DATA — NO LOGIN
OPEN THE TOOLSTHE REST OF THE STACK
ORANGE = OURSPROJECT MANAGEMENT
PICK ONE, COMMITThe default above about $25M for a reason. Expensive, and its own users say the financial workflow takes too many steps. Worth it if you actually configure cost codes and workflows.
FITS — GCs $25M+Better if your drawings and models already live in Autodesk. Field adoption is good, cost management is thinner than Procore's.
FITS — Design-heavy GCsBuilt for residential and small commercial. Do not force it onto a $60M commercial job.
FITS — Residential, small GCsESTIMATING
TWO TOOLS, NOT FIVECloud takeoff that estimators actually adopt. Fast to learn, fine for most commercial bid volume.
FITS — Subs and mid GCsAI takeoff that is genuinely fast on repetitive plans and needs checking on anything unusual. Use it to draft, not to submit.
FITS — High bid volumeStill the tool everyone marks up in. Buy it and stop arguing.
FITS — EveryoneFIELD CAPTURE
WHATEVER THE FIELD OPENSTask and plan management that works on a phone with bad signal. Best adoption per dollar in this category.
FITS — Subs, self-perform GCsWalk the job with a 360 camera, get a searchable record. Pays for itself the first time a dispute goes to documentation.
FITS — GCs with dispute exposureDaily reports done well and not much else. Fine if that is the only gap.
FITS — SubsACCOUNTING
HARDEST TO CHANGE, CHOOSE CAREFULLYUgly, deeply capable, and the CPA already knows it. Job cost done right.
FITS — GCs $50M+Payroll and certified reporting are the reason people buy it. Reporting still comes out through Excel, support is a common complaint, and it ships no AI of its own.
FITS — Union subsWorks until it does not. If you are running WIP schedules in Excel next to it, you have outgrown it.
FITS — Under $10MCOMMS
FEWER CHANNELS, NOT MOREYou already pay for it. Teams and SharePoint configured properly beat a new tool nobody logs into.
FITS — EveryoneGreat for office, ignored in the field. Do not make it the record.
FITS — Office-heavy firmsAI ASSISTANTS
ONE ACCOUNT, POLICY IN WRITINGBest of the general assistants on long documents — specs, contracts, submittal packages. Set a data policy before you roll it out.
FITS — Office staffBroadest ecosystem and the one your team already opened without telling you. Get it managed instead of shadow-used.
FITS — EveryoneNarrow on purpose: RFI intake, routing, drafted response. Live and demo-able on this site right now.
FITS — GCs and subs with RFI volumeWANT THIS APPLIED TO YOUR STACK? BRING YOUR LICENSE LIST.
BOOK 20 MINUTES